Our freedoms of speech, religion, press, petition, and assembly are set out in the first amendment in the United States of America’s Constitution which defines what America strives for. Citizens have the right to speak their minds about whatever issues they believe in without being persecuted. Of course, there are some laws and regulations on how far citizens can go to speak their minds. For example, a person will not get away with bombing the pentagon to show his or her disdain for the government. However, a student should not get suspended just because they wear an armband that protests what they believe is wrong. As long as students are not disturbing class or school in general, they have the right to wear what they believe in or are protesting about. Schools should allow protests that do not involve disruption of class and not suspend students who protest peacefully.
This is what happened in the Tinker v. Des Moines court case in 1969. A group of students decided to wear black armbands to protest, basically, the Vietnam War. However, some high school principals of Des Moines did not appreciate this. When they heard about what these students planned to do, they encouraged the school board to make a school policy that no black armbands were to be worn on school property, and if worn the student would be asked to remove it or be suspended until the armband was removed. Three students proceeded to school wearing the black armbands and they were suspended. (Tedford, 2009).
First, the policy was created before the situation happened. This action was taken to scare or “chill” students from exercising free speech. It would have been understandable to create the policy after the students’ protest if it caused any disruption. However, the students came in and wore the armbands peacefully. Secondly, the school board’s policy against the armbands violated the first amendment. The court case states clearly that “in wearing armbands, the petitioners were quiet and passive. They were not disruptive and did not impinge upon the rights of others. In these circumstances, their conduct was within the protection of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment” (Tedford, 2009).
Protesting should be accepted at schools, but with regulations so things do not get out of hand. Schools do not allow protest because they are afraid that situations will get out of hand. If students are allowed to protest on school property it will give students an idea of what freedom of speech is about. Maybe if schools allowed small protesting to go on, students may learn how to protest without getting physical or out of hand. The students who wore armbands protested in a way that did not cause any disruptions. Schools need to see that not all protests are bad.
The first amendment was installed for a reason, namely, to express our opinions without persecution. If students learn to protest in a peaceful way during their time at school, then there would be less violent protest. The court case, Tinker v. Des Moines, shows that it is possible to see that protesting at school is protected free speech and will not cause a disruption in the learning process.
-GW


